Last updated:
legend.trade on Hyperliquid: fees, volume and users
Social trading: copy single trades or auto-copy traders (Autocopy), across crypto, stock and commodity perps.
Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24. Homepage facts checked 2026-10-19. See the methodology.
About legend.trade
| Category | Copy trading |
|---|---|
| Type | Social trading |
| Venues / chains | Hyperliquid |
| Mobile app | Not stated on homepage |
| Markets | Crypto, Stocks & indices, Commodities |
| Max leverage | Not stated on homepage |
| Copy trading | Yes |
| Effective builder fee, 30d | 5.51 bps |
| Website | legend.trade |
Sources and dates
- Homepage checked 2026-10-19: https://legend.trade
- Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24
“Not stated on homepage” means the page does not say; it does not mean the feature is missing.
legend.trade metrics on Hyperliquid
| Period | Builder revenue | Volume | New users | Effective fee (bps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day | $2.2k | $4.01M | 77 | 5.42 |
| 7 days | $16.3k | $29.52M | 779 | 5.53 |
| 30 days | $162k | $294.60M | 2,995 | 5.51 |
| 90 days | $340k | $628.51M | 4,882 | 5.42 |
| All time | $610k | $1.23B | 5,921 total | 4.98 |
Effective fee = builder revenue / builder volume, in basis points (1 bps = 0.01%). It is an average realised rate, not the fee each user is charged; "—" means no volume in the period.
30 days vs the previous 30 days
| Metric | Last 30 days | Previous 30 days | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builder revenue | $162k | $107k | +52.2% |
| Volume | $294.60M | $190.96M | +54.3% |
| New users | 2,995 | 1,689 | +77.3% |
How fees work on legend.trade
Trading on Hyperliquid through any app costs Hyperliquid's base fee, which depends on your 14-day volume and any HYPE staking discount. If the app uses a builder code, it can charge an additional builder fee that you approved. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 5.51 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. The full tier table is on Hyperliquid fees.
Highlights from the data
Positives
- 30-day builder revenue is up 52.2% vs the previous 30 days.
- 2,995 new users in the last 30 days, up from 1,689 in the previous 30.
Watch-outs
- Nothing notable from the stated data.
These points are derived only from the figures above and facts stated on the homepage; they are not a review.
Similar copy trading apps
- fomo — $1.51M builder revenue, 30d
- Invo — $280k builder revenue, 30d
- ApexLiquid — $10.0k builder revenue, 30d
- Dextrabot — $9.0k builder revenue, 30d
Back to the full comparison table or all copy trading.
FAQ
What are legend.trade's fees?
Every Hyperliquid order pays Hyperliquid's base fee (at the lowest volume tier, 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker for perps, per Hyperliquid docs, snapshot 2026-10-20). An app can add a builder fee on top. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 5.51 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. Check legend.trade directly for its current rate. See Hyperliquid fees.
Is legend.trade built on Hyperliquid?
legend.trade sends orders to Hyperliquid (Hyperliquid). It appears on the Hyperliquid builder leaderboard with 5,921 users all time.
How much does legend.trade earn from Hyperliquid trading?
Builder fees on Hyperliquid volume were $162k over the last 30 days and $610k all time, as of 2026-10-24. This counts only Hyperliquid builder fees, not the app's total revenue.