Last updated:
Moonbot on Hyperliquid: fees, volume and users
Manual and automated crypto trading terminal with scalping tools, TradingView and Telegram integration, and a demo (simulation) mode.
Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24. Homepage facts checked 2026-10-19. See the methodology.
About Moonbot
| Category | Trading terminals |
|---|---|
| Type | Terminal and bot |
| Venues / chains | Multiple exchanges, including Hyperliquid |
| Mobile app | Not stated on homepage |
| Markets | Not stated on homepage |
| Max leverage | Not stated on homepage |
| Copy trading | Not stated on homepage |
| Effective builder fee, 30d | 1.51 bps |
| Stated on homepage | Demo mode |
| Website | moonbot.pro |
Sources and dates
- Homepage checked 2026-10-19: https://moonbot.pro
- Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24
“Not stated on homepage” means the page does not say; it does not mean the feature is missing.
Moonbot metrics on Hyperliquid
| Period | Builder revenue | Volume | New users | Effective fee (bps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day | $1.1k | $7.23M | 0 | 1.50 |
| 7 days | $15.9k | $105.45M | 0 | 1.51 |
| 30 days | $59.5k | $393.91M | 6 | 1.51 |
| 90 days | $188k | $1.24B | 34 | 1.51 |
| All time | $764k | $5.05B | 249 total | 1.51 |
Effective fee = builder revenue / builder volume, in basis points (1 bps = 0.01%). It is an average realised rate, not the fee each user is charged; "—" means no volume in the period.
30 days vs the previous 30 days
| Metric | Last 30 days | Previous 30 days | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builder revenue | $59.5k | $54.4k | +9.3% |
| Volume | $393.91M | $355.75M | +10.7% |
| New users | 6 | 16 | -62.5% |
How fees work on Moonbot
Trading on Hyperliquid through any app costs Hyperliquid's base fee, which depends on your 14-day volume and any HYPE staking discount. If the app uses a builder code, it can charge an additional builder fee that you approved. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 1.51 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. The full tier table is on Hyperliquid fees.
Highlights from the data
Positives
- 30-day builder revenue is up 9.3% vs the previous 30 days.
- Demo mode.
Watch-outs
- Only 249 users have traded through its builder code (all time).
- 6 new users in the last 30 days, down from 16 in the previous 30.
These points are derived only from the figures above and facts stated on the homepage; they are not a review.
Similar trading terminals apps
- HyperDash — $470k builder revenue, 30d
- Insilico — $169k builder revenue, 30d
- Metascalp — $63.1k builder revenue, 30d
- Tread.fi — $60.0k builder revenue, 30d
Back to the full comparison table or all trading terminals.
FAQ
What are Moonbot's fees?
Every Hyperliquid order pays Hyperliquid's base fee (at the lowest volume tier, 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker for perps, per Hyperliquid docs, snapshot 2026-10-20). An app can add a builder fee on top. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 1.51 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. Check Moonbot directly for its current rate. See Hyperliquid fees.
Is Moonbot built on Hyperliquid?
Moonbot sends orders to Hyperliquid (Multiple exchanges, including Hyperliquid). It appears on the Hyperliquid builder leaderboard with 249 users all time.
How much does Moonbot earn from Hyperliquid trading?
Builder fees on Hyperliquid volume were $59.5k over the last 30 days and $764k all time, as of 2026-10-24. This counts only Hyperliquid builder fees, not the app's total revenue.