Last updated:
Tread.fi on Hyperliquid: fees, volume and users
Algorithmic trading terminal and order/execution management system that connects CEXs and DEXs and aims to reduce slippage (for example with TWAP orders).
Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24. Homepage facts checked 2026-10-19. See the methodology.
About Tread.fi
| Category | Trading terminals |
|---|---|
| Type | Algorithmic terminal |
| Venues / chains | CEXs and DEXs, including Hyperliquid |
| Mobile app | Not stated on homepage |
| Markets | Not stated on homepage |
| Max leverage | Not stated on homepage |
| Copy trading | Not stated on homepage |
| Effective builder fee, 30d | 1.05 bps |
| Website | tread.fi |
Sources and dates
- Homepage checked 2026-10-19: https://tread.fi
- Builder metrics: flowscan builder leaderboard, snapshot 2026-10-24
“Not stated on homepage” means the page does not say; it does not mean the feature is missing.
Tread.fi metrics on Hyperliquid
| Period | Builder revenue | Volume | New users | Effective fee (bps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day | $2.2k | $18.46M | 6 | 1.21 |
| 7 days | $11.8k | $126.77M | 37 | 0.93 |
| 30 days | $60.0k | $572.34M | 149 | 1.05 |
| 90 days | $179k | $1.35B | 326 | 1.33 |
| All time | $2.42M | $12.86B | 5,226 total | 1.88 |
Effective fee = builder revenue / builder volume, in basis points (1 bps = 0.01%). It is an average realised rate, not the fee each user is charged; "—" means no volume in the period.
30 days vs the previous 30 days
| Metric | Last 30 days | Previous 30 days | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builder revenue | $60.0k | $74.9k | -19.9% |
| Volume | $572.34M | $486.40M | +17.7% |
| New users | 149 | 109 | +36.7% |
How fees work on Tread.fi
Trading on Hyperliquid through any app costs Hyperliquid's base fee, which depends on your 14-day volume and any HYPE staking discount. If the app uses a builder code, it can charge an additional builder fee that you approved. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 1.05 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. The full tier table is on Hyperliquid fees.
Highlights from the data
Positives
- 149 new users in the last 30 days, up from 109 in the previous 30.
Watch-outs
- 30-day builder revenue is down 19.9% vs the previous 30 days.
These points are derived only from the figures above and facts stated on the homepage; they are not a review.
Similar trading terminals apps
- HyperDash — $470k builder revenue, 30d
- Insilico — $169k builder revenue, 30d
- Metascalp — $63.1k builder revenue, 30d
- Moonbot — $59.5k builder revenue, 30d
Back to the full comparison table or all trading terminals.
FAQ
What are Tread.fi's fees?
Every Hyperliquid order pays Hyperliquid's base fee (at the lowest volume tier, 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker for perps, per Hyperliquid docs, snapshot 2026-10-20). An app can add a builder fee on top. Over the last 30 days its builder revenue divided by its builder volume was 1.05 bps. That is an average realised rate across all users and markets, not necessarily the fee you are charged. Check Tread.fi directly for its current rate. See Hyperliquid fees.
Is Tread.fi built on Hyperliquid?
Tread.fi sends orders to Hyperliquid (CEXs and DEXs, including Hyperliquid). It appears on the Hyperliquid builder leaderboard with 5,226 users all time.
How much does Tread.fi earn from Hyperliquid trading?
Builder fees on Hyperliquid volume were $60.0k over the last 30 days and $2.42M all time, as of 2026-10-24. This counts only Hyperliquid builder fees, not the app's total revenue.